| monki |
I thought about how most of the reasearch we looked at was about helping people with disabilities j |
yes monki |
It’s like the first thing they come to think about when they have realistic representations of reality is to bring everyone up to this normative level of human cognition monki |
whereas your mars research seem to be more about expanding human abilities monki |
I mean it’s fine and helpful to get people to be able to ride buses even if they had a stroke monki |
but shouldn’t we develop flying cars instead? :) j |
wow, that’s a really rich theme to develop a persuasive argument around. j |
the disability thing is sort of a failure of imagination, i would suggest at the moment. monki |
i think so too monki |
A lot of research for a small “market” j |
precis. monki |
If you really wanted to help a lot of people you can do something to help developing countries monki |
and it doesn’t seem like its the medical industries pushing it either monki |
just like you say, a failure of imagination j |
hmmm yeah, well maybe we can begin to visual these issues as well and why people get stuck in certain places correlating the creative possibilites with the somewhat self-limited strategic habits researchers seem mired in at the moment within some disciplines. monki |
the genetics people seem to be 50-50 as to cure diseases and enhance human capabilities :) monki |
Maybe it’s because the researches take their own bodies as referent point in the end monki |
well, i dont know much about genetics but it seems like some genetics research are into curing inheritable diseases and some are into morphing humans with fishes or something hehe monki |
I have always been sceptical about the idea of the cyborg j |
The term was coined in 1960 when Manfred Clynes and Nathan Kline used it in an article about the advantages of self-regulating human-machine systems in outer space. monki |
since it views technology as an extention of human functions, which is a limiting idea i think monki |
ah monki |
didn’t know that monki |
They probably had a different definition of it then monki |
different than the popular culture figure of the cyborg j |
yes, “The cyborg is often seen today merely as an organism that has enhanced abilities due to technology,[3] but this perhaps oversimplifies the category of feedback.” j |
of course: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyborg monki |
I think technology have different origins and different logics than the human body, so there is no idea using that as reference. On the other hand I think it’s more about human becoming like technology monki |
this perhaps oversimplifies the category of feedback.” monki |
so true! monki |
there is also the related (and very japanese) idea of the exoskeleton monki |
I began to think now of how the figure of the cyborg and of the exoskeleton relate to the concept of the body in different ways monki |
where the cyborg is ultimately ONE organism monki |
the exoskeleton remains external and foreign to the body monki |
only that the feedback loop is so complete that there movements become one monki |
a common theme in cyborg mythology is also the technology taking over the humanity left in the human monki |
so technology directs its destructive force inwards monki |
whereas the destructive force of the exoskeleton is when it’s running amok monki |
the force is directed outwards monki |
could it be a western/eastern thing? :) j |
yes Day changed to 08 Dec 2007 monki |
the fear of the exoskeleton running amok is maybe the same fear japanese people have of making a public fool of themselves monki |
the fear of not staying in ones place monki |
which is the fear of a collectivist society monki |
the western individual society fears losing that individuality by integrating too much with technology |
